Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Government

Snurb — Wednesday 26 June 2024 21:45

Tech Firms and Their Poor Performance as Democratic Gatekeepers

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | P³ ICA 2024 Postconference |

The third speaker in this opening plenary at the P³: Power, Propaganda, Polarisation ICA 2024 postconference is the great Daniel Kreiss, who shifts our focus to the role of tech firms in the context of democratic challenges. They may be seen as ‘democratic gatekeepers’, potentially playing a crucial role in keeping anti-democratic leaders and parties from power. Democracies are saved when there are strong political institutions to save them, but these institutions need to include media organisations and platforms as well.

Journalists are ‘civil gatekeepers’, then, who communicate ideas to the public about what is and is not democratic; when …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Monday 24 June 2024 14:40

The Impact of Russia’s Nuclear Threats on Ukraine War Narratives on English, French, and German Social Media

Politics | Government | Social Media | Facebook | Twitter | ICA 2024 |

The final speaker in this ICA 2024 conference session is Jisoo Kim, whose interest is in the shaping of communication flows about Ukraine across English, French, and German communities. Such efforts are part of information warfare, aiming to win the battle for public opinion and perception; Russia, in particular, is employing state media and troll armies to disseminate its propaganda about the causes and progress of its war against Ukraine. More recently, this has also include nuclear threats, rhetoric, and diplomacy.

The present study examines this with a particular view to cross-platform content flows and time-series analysis of the distribution …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 22 June 2024 11:36

The Transformation of Far-Right and Anti-Systemic Discourses in Four Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | Facebook | Twitter | ICA 2024 |

p>The final speaker in this ICA 2024 conference session is Frederik Henriksen, whose focus is on the transformation of far-right political activities on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. The far-right shifted the focus of its activities during this time, and joined forces with other anti-systemic actors, particularly pushing mis- and disinformation on the pandemic and the health measures implemented by governments to address it.

The present study sought to identify these discursive shifts in response to the pandemic, amongst far-right actors in Austria, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden and across multiple social media platforms – Facebook, Twitter, Gab, VKontakte, Reddit …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 22 June 2024 11:29

Understanding the Illiberal Public Sphere

Politics | Government | Polarisation | ICA 2024 |

I skipped the morning session this Saturday at the ICA 2024 conference as I was doing a live interview with Australian breakfast television about the current, ill-defined Parliamentary Inquiry into social media; more on that another time. So, I’m starting with a session on mis- and disinformation which begins with Sabina Mihelj, who has just published an open-access book on The Illiberal Public Sphere. Illiberalism has been on the rise at a global level, eroding liberal democratic systems – but how is this different from the concept of populism?

Especially in Eastern Europe, trends are going well beyond populism …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 21 June 2024 11:38

The Chinese Government’s Changing Strategies for Media Capture in Hong Kong

Politics | Government | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ICA 2024 |

The last speaker in this ICA 2024 conference is Francis Lee, whose focus is on the experience of media capture in Hong Kong. Typically, such media capture can involve ownership cooptation, advertising and other financial incentives, cognitive capture of journalists through constant interactions, legal measures and the criminalisation of journalistic activities, and even violence with impunity against journalists.

But not all such strategies are used in all countries where such media capture takes place, and governments may change their mix of these strategies over time. Their choice depends on local contexts (such as the exploitability of economic or legal systems …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 21 June 2024 11:37

Theorising the Elements of Media Capture in Backsliding, Autocratising Democracies

Politics | Government | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ICA 2024 |

The second speaker in this ICA 2024 conference session is the great Cherian George, whose focus is on the theory of media manipulation in autocratising electoral regimes. Autocracy or authoritarianism as a regime type is different from the process of autocratising and democratic backsliding, and the process is often related to media capture by political actors.

Existing autocracies are often born this way: this is the case for China or Iran, for instance; conversely, backsliding democracies like Turkey, Poland, or Israel experience a change in their democratic institutions. Singapore or Hong Kong, in turn, are something else and in between …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 21 June 2024 11:36

The Trump Administration’s Messy State Capture of Voice of America

Politics | Government | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ICA 2024 |

The next session at the ICA 2024 conference is on democratic backsliding, and begins with Kate Wright; her focus is on state-led democratic backsliding and its relationship with the political capture of public service media organisations. This is difficult to study due to the problems with gaining access to such media organisations, especially as the political capture is taking place; at best, we might review this after the fact through interviews with journalists.

The present study is in the unusual position of having been able to study the state capture of the Voice of America by the Trump administration both …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 27 April 2024 05:50

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum (FGZ RISC 2024)

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ‘Fake News’ | Social Media | Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | FGZ RISC 2024 |

Indicators of Social Cohesion in Social Media and Online Media

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum

Axel Bruns

  • 25 Apr. 2024 – Keynote presented at the Indicators of Social Cohesion in Social Media and Online Media symposium, Hamburg

Presentation Slides

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum from Axel Bruns
» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 26 April 2024 22:25

Tracing the Changing Nuclear Energy Debate in the German Twittersphere

Politics | Government | Polarisation | 'Big Data' | Social Media | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | FGZ RISC 2024 |

And the last speaker in this Indicators of Social Cohesion symposium is another local, Gregor Wiedemann, who is applying such Social Media Observatory approaches to the German debate about nuclear power. Nuclear energy slowly began to be phased out after the Fukushima disaster, but this has been challenged in recent times especially as a result of the energy crisis following the Russian attack on Ukraine, and some political actors are still calling for the (technologically impossible) reactivation of German nuclear power plants.

This is a useful case study of polarisation in public debate, and Gregor studied the dynamics of this …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Thursday 25 April 2024 18:02

Destructive Polarisation in the Voice to Parliament Referendum: A Preliminary Assessment

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ‘Fake News’ | Social Media | Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | FGZ RISC 2024 |

It is an unseasonably cold Thursday morning in Hamburg, and after a great opening session last night with Aleksandra Urman, Mykola Makhortykh, and Jing Zeng we are now starting the first full day of the Indicators of Social Cohesion symposium. I’m presenting the morning keynote, on our current work assessing the news and social media debate around Australia’s failed Voice to Parliament referendum as a possible case of destructive polarisation.More on this as the research develops, but for now my slides are here:

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament …
» continue reading...

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 14
  • Next page
Government
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.