Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Understanding the Diverging Dynamics of Conspiracy Theories on Twitter

Snurb — Saturday 5 October 2019 10:06
Politics | Social Media | Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | AoIR 2019 |

The final speaker in this AoIR 2019 session is QUT DMRC PhD graduate Dr. Jing Zeng, whose focus is on the automated dissemination of conspiracy theories on Twitter – including suggestions that celebrities like Justin Bieber, industry leaders like Mark Zuckerberg, and royals are actually shape-shifting lizards; that planes spread mind-controlling chemtrails; that the Earth is flat; or that the California wildfires were started by a new energy weapon created by the U.S. government.

Such conspiracy theorists are experts at providing apparently simple explanations for complex phenomena. They also clusters together to support each other’s explanations with self-reinforcing theories that paint all opponents as part of the conspiracy. But ‘conspiracy theory is often either used as a generic term that classifies all such theories as equivalent, or focusses only on very specific cases. It would be more useful to develop a better typology of such theories and their dynamics, and this aim is what this project pursues.

The project works with some 100,000 tweets by 34,000 Twitter accounts over a period of several months during 2018 and 2019; it examined the clusters in the retweet networks between them, and they key actors in these clusters. Such clusters focussed variously on anti-vaccination, flat-earth, anti-agenda 21 (a UN agenda for sustainable development), chemtrails/illuminati/lizard-people, pizzagate/911/climate-change and directed energy weapon conspiracies. Anti-flat earth and pro-vaccination groups were more separate from this.

The project also calculated the Botometer score for all of these accounts, and it turns out that bots are considerably more prominent in the politically tinged and U.S.-focussed conspiracies. Further manual analysis of the 120 most influential accounts in the network provides some additional insights: first, there are some fairly inactive yet highly influential human accounts on either side of these conspiracy theories.

Second, there are a number of highly active bots that contribute especially into U.S.-based conspiracy theories, are mostly expressing support for Donald Trump, include three star emoji in their account names, and post to the #TrumpTrain hashtag that helps promote other pro-Trump accounts; indeed, some 20% of all accounts in the underlying dataset self-identify as Trump supporters. It is difficult to establish whether all of these are actually bots, however; some hardcore Trump supporters post so frequently to appear as bots to Botometer.

  • 5086 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.