Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Reporting on Nelson Mandela’s Imprisonment at Robben Island

Snurb — Wednesday 10 July 2019 22:45
Politics | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | IAMCR 2019 |

The next speaker in this IAMCR 2019 session is Martha Evans, whose focus is on the reporting on Nelson Mandela’s imprisonment on Robben Island. Mandela came to personify the anti-apartheid struggle – also by becoming an absent signifier of the struggle, which enabled him to become the ultimate polysemic persona onto whom all sorts of perspectives were projected.

Robben Island had long been a prison camp and a dumping ground for political prisoners; Mandela’s incarceration there only added to Mandela’s almost mythical status. This also created pressures for his gaolers, however, and as a result he was not entirely cut off from the outside: from time to time he was able to engage with journalists. But such access was tightly controlled and subject to strict media laws.

The few journalists who gained access to Mandela appear a somewhat random choice, and they are separated by periods of years. In 1964, two early visits (staged partly in response to rumours that Mandela had died in prison) backfired as they generated more negative publicity for the government; all publications from the visits were repurposed for anti-apartheid propaganda, and the photographs circulated in anti-apartheid posters for decades to come.

In 1977, the government organised another secret visit to the island, again to counter negative stories about brutality in the prison. But this involved various censorial conditions: journalists were not told where they were going until the last minute; articles were subject to censorship; government ministers were given a right of reply; and no photos were to be taken. Prison officials and prisoners also did not know that they were coming.

This was experienced as a gross violation of the prisoners’ privacy; journalists were led into their cells without any opportunity for preparation, and this meant that prisoners including Mandela had no agency in how they presented themselves to the journalists. Local journalists felt compelled to report positively on the prisoners’ conditions, while international journalists continued to report highly critically about the island.

Censorship thus served only to enhance interest in what the apartheid government was trying to hide; it helped with the mythologisation of the prison and its prisoners.

  • 1595 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.