Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Towards a Better Categorisation of Political Influencer Types

Snurb — Saturday 6 June 2026 23:57
Politics | Social Media | ICA 2026 | Liveblog |

The next speaker in this panel on influencers at the 2026 International Communication Association conference in Cape Town is Desirée Schmuck. Here, the focus is on ordinary people who gained popularity through their social media activities, and excludes people who are influential because of their pre-existing popularity.

Such influencers are increasingly relevant especially for young audiences, but remain undertheorised; theory tends to draw on opinion leadership, but whether this applies to influencers still needs to be examined in more detail. They do of course convey opinions, but are not necessarily knowledgeable (as the original opinion leadership model would expect), nor personally known to all their followers.

So, influencers may be understood as parasocial opinion leaders, but that concept too was developed for celebrities rather than grassroots influencers, and there isn’t necessarily always a very direct social interaction between influencers and their followers.

A new typology may be needed, then, which situates opinion leaders along two dimensions: high versus low personalised communication, and high, medium, or low status. Low status would represent self-built personal networks; high status would mean pre-existing and professionally constructed networks, while medium status have self-built public networks.

Overall, this distinguishes traditional opinion leaders (grassroots), proximal mass opinion leaders, and distant mass opinion leaders (celebrities). The extent to which any such opinion leader types are present in any one media environment may well vary considerably between countries, due to local characteristics and contexts. This framework then enables us to better investigate the specific communicative styles, approaches, and impacts of these different influencer types.

One focus here should be on the impact of the status dimension on the effectiveness of different influencers’ political communication approaches. The concept of attainability might be especially important here in the study of influencers horizontal influence, and influencer-audience booths and interactions ought to be better explore too.

  • 3 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Revisiting ‘the’ Public Sphere and Its Algorithmically Shaped Publics (ZeMKI ComAI 2026)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.