Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

How German Political Parties Address Internal Intrafactional Differences

Snurb — Saturday 6 June 2026 01:55
Politics | Polarisation | ICA 2026 | Liveblog |

The next speaker in this session at the 2026 International Communication Association conference in Cape Town is Christiane Eilders, whose interest is in the communication styles and conflict resolution processes within mainstream parties in Germany. The core focus here is on factionalism within political parties, then, where parties divide into ideological subgroups that pursue specific policies or strategic goals; such factionalism can be an important safety valve which prevents parties from splitting apart altogether. Factionalism also affects electoral successes, the efficiency of governing coalitions, and the stability of the overall party system, however.

How do party factions communicate and interact with one another, though – through conflict, communication, or cooperation? Depending on the level of polarisation between them, and their level of consensus or non-consensus orientation, interfaction interactions can take various forms. This was studied for the SPD and CDU parties, as the traditionally leading parties in the German political environment, with particular focus on the protocols of the major party congresses.

Such factions can exist at the parliamentary level, focus on specific issues, or exist as grassroots networks for the SPD; or divide into ‘sociological’ (meaning socioeconomic) and cross-level associations (connecting politicians and other interest groups) for the CDU.

The project manually coded party congress debates between 2015 and 2024, at the paragraph level; of some 2,500 cases, 1,500 have been coded by now. Key topics include climate, migration, pensions, labour, military, and the annual keynote debates selected for each party. These varied in prominence over time.

The CDU’s youth network, for instance, engaged especially in emotional mobilisation; the SPD’s parliamentary left focussed strongly on cooperation, while its labour politics group was more conflict-focussed. There are various attack directions: the youth CDU frequently attacks individuals, the party leadership, and the whole congress; while the youth SPD mostly attacks the whole party and its leadership. Internal conflicts in the SPD appear to be much more tied to factional groups than in the CDU.

  • 4 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Revisiting ‘the’ Public Sphere and Its Algorithmically Shaped Publics (ZeMKI ComAI 2026)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.